z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Fluorescence artifact correction in the thrombin generation assay: Necessity for correction algorithms in procoagulant samples
Author(s) -
Chang William C.,
Jackson Joseph W.,
Machlus Kellie R.,
Wolberg Alisa S.,
Ovanesov Mikhail V.
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2475-0379
DOI - 10.1002/rth2.12499
Subject(s) - thrombomodulin , thrombin , coagulation , chemistry , hemostasis , substrate (aquarium) , chromatography , thrombin generation , calibration curve , biochemistry , detection limit , immunology , medicine , biology , platelet , ecology
The thrombin generation (TG) test is a global hemostasis assay sensitive to procoagulant conditions. However, some TG assays may underestimate elevated TG when the thrombin fluorogenic substrate is depleted or fluorescence is attenuated by the inner filter effect (IFE). Objectives We sought to elucidate the extent to which procoagulant conditions require correcting for fluorogenic substrate depletion and/or IFE. Methods We analyzed corrections for substrate depletion and IFE and their effect on TG parameters in plasma samples with elevated blood coagulation factors in the presence or absence of thrombomodulin via commercial calibrated automated thrombogram (CAT) platform and in‐house software capable of internal thrombin calibration with or without CAT‐like artifact correction. Results Elevated thrombin peak height (TPH) and endogenous thrombin potential (ETP) were detected with 2× and 4× increases in blood coagulation factors I, V, VIII, IX, X, and XI, or prothrombin in the presence or absence of artifact correction. The effect of the CAT algorithm was evident in TG curves from both low procoagulant (thrombomodulin‐supplemented) and procoagulant (factor‐supplemented) plasma samples. However, in all samples, with the exception of elevated prothrombin, CAT’s correction was small (<10%) and did not affect detection of procoagulant samples versus normal plasma. For elevated prothrombin samples, uncorrected TPH or ETP values were underestimated, and CAT correction produced drastically elevated TG curves. Conclusions Our data suggest that correction for substrate consumption and IFE, as offered by the CAT algorithm, is critical for detecting a subset of extremely procoagulant samples, such as elevated prothrombin, but is not necessary for all other conditions, including elevated factors XI and VIII.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here