Is waveform worth it? A comparison of Li DAR approaches for vegetation and landscape characterization

Light Detection and Ranging (Li DAR ) systems are frequently used in ecological studies to measure vegetation canopy structure. Waveform Li DAR systems offer new capabilities for vegetation modelling by measuring the time‐varying signal of the laser pulse as it illuminates different elements of the canopy, providing an opportunity to describe the 3D structure of vegetation canopies more fully. This article provides a comparison between waveform airborne laser scanning ( ALS ) data and discrete return ALS data, using terrestrial laser scanning ( TLS ) data as an independent validation. With reference to two urban landscape typologies, we demonstrate that discrete return ALS data provided more biased and less consistent measurements of woodland canopy height (in a 100% tree covered plot, height underestimation bias = 0.82 m; sd  = 1.78 m) than waveform ALS data (height overestimation bias = −0.65 m; sd  = 1.45 m). The same biases were found in suburban data (in a plot consisting of 100% hard targets e.g. roads and pavements), but discrete return ALS were more consistent here than waveform data ( sd  = 0.57 m compared to waveform sd  = 0.76 m). Discrete return ALS data performed poorly in describing the canopy understorey, compared to waveform data. Our results also highlighted errors in discrete return ALS intensity, which were not present with waveform data. Waveform ALS data therefore offer an improved method for measuring the three‐dimensional structure of vegetation systems, but carry a higher data processing cost. New toolkits for analysing waveform data will expedite future analysis and allow ecologists to exploit the information content of waveform Li DAR .