z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Location, location, location: considerations when using lightweight drones in challenging environments
Author(s) -
Duffy James P.,
Cunliffe Andrew M.,
DeBell Leon,
Sandbrook Chris,
Wich Serge A.,
Shutler Jamie D.,
MyersSmith Isla H.,
Varela Miguel R.,
Anderson Karen
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
remote sensing in ecology and conservation
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.191
H-Index - 21
ISSN - 2056-3485
DOI - 10.1002/rse2.58
Subject(s) - drone , software deployment , computer science , data quality , work (physics) , aeronautics , environmental resource management , engineering , environmental science , operations management , metric (unit) , genetics , biology , operating system , mechanical engineering
Lightweight drones have emerged recently as a remote sensing survey tool of choice for ecologists, conservation practitioners and environmental scientists. In published work, there are plentiful details on the parameters and settings used for successful data capture, but in contrast there is a dearth of information describing the operational complexity of drone deployment. Information about the practices of flying in the field, whilst currently lacking, would be useful for others embarking on new drone‐based investigations. As a group of drone‐piloting scientists, we have operated lightweight drones for research in over 25 projects, in over 10 countries, and in polar, desert, coastal and tropical ecosystems, with many hundreds of hours of flying experience between us. The purpose of this paper was to document the lesser‐reported methodological pitfalls of drone deployments so that other scientists can understand the spectrum of considerations that need to be accounted for prior to, and during drone survey flights. Herein, we describe the most common challenges encountered, alongside mitigation and remediation actions that increase the chances of safe and successful data capture. Challenges are grouped into the following categories: (i) pre‐flight planning, (ii) flight operations, (iii) weather, (iv) redundancy, (v) data quality, (vi) batteries. We also discuss the importance of scientists undertaking ethical assessment of their drone practices, to identify and mitigate potential conflicts associated with drone use in particular areas. By sharing our experience, our intention is that the paper will assist those embarking on new drone deployments, increasing the efficacy of acquiring high‐quality data from this new proximal aerial viewpoint.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here