z-logo
Premium
The effect of random restrictions on formula size
Author(s) -
Impagliazzo Russell,
Nisan Noam
Publication year - 1993
Publication title -
random structures and algorithms
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.314
H-Index - 69
eISSN - 1098-2418
pISSN - 1042-9832
DOI - 10.1002/rsa.3240040202
Subject(s) - boolean function , upper and lower bounds , mathematics , function (biology) , combinatorics , parity (physics) , parity function , discrete mathematics , random variable , boolean expression , statistics , physics , quantum mechanics , mathematical analysis , evolutionary biology , biology
We consider the formula size complexity of boolean functions over the base consisting of ∧, ∨, and ¬ gates. In 1961 Subbotovskaya proved that, for any boolean function on n variables, setting all but a randomly chosen ϵ n variables to randomly chosen constants, reduces the expected complexity of the induced function by at least a factor. This fact was used by Subbotovskaya to derive a lower bound of Ω( n 1.5 ) for the formula size of the parity function, and more recently by Andreev who exhibited at lower bound of Ω C ( n 2.5 /log O (1) ( n )) for a function in P . We present the first improvement of Subbotovskaya's result, showing that the expected formual complexity of a function restricted as above is at most an O (ϵ γ ) franction of its original complexity, forThis allows us to give an improved lower bound of Ω( n 2.556… ) for Andreev's function. At the time of discovery, this was the best formula lower bound known for any function in NP. © 1993 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom