z-logo
Premium
Tight bounds for popping algorithms
Author(s) -
Guo Heng,
He Kun
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
random structures and algorithms
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.314
H-Index - 69
eISSN - 1098-2418
pISSN - 1042-9832
DOI - 10.1002/rsa.20928
Subject(s) - algorithm , sink (geography) , computer science , sampling (signal processing) , spanning tree , mathematics , combinatorics , cartography , filter (signal processing) , computer vision , geography
We sharpen run‐time analysis for algorithms under the partial rejection sampling framework. Our method yields improved bounds for: the cluster‐popping algorithm for approximating all‐terminal network reliability; the cycle‐popping algorithm for sampling rooted spanning trees; and the sink‐popping algorithm for sampling sink‐free orientations. In all three applications, our bounds are not only tight in order, but also optimal in30 constants.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here