z-logo
Premium
Testing for forbidden order patterns in an array
Author(s) -
Newman Ilan,
Rabinovich Yuri,
Rajendraprasad Deepak,
Sohler Christian
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
random structures and algorithms
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.314
H-Index - 69
eISSN - 1098-2418
pISSN - 1042-9832
DOI - 10.1002/rsa.20840
Subject(s) - property testing , combinatorics , sequence (biology) , upper and lower bounds , monotone polygon , order (exchange) , mathematics , existential quantification , property (philosophy) , discrete mathematics , group testing , mathematical analysis , philosophy , genetics , geometry , finance , epistemology , economics , biology
A sequence f : [ n ] → R contains a pattern π ∈ S k , that is, a permutations of [ k ], iff there are indices i 1  < … <  i k , such that f ( i x ) >  f ( i y ) whenever π ( x ) >  π ( y ). Otherwise, f is π ‐free. We study the property testing problem of distinguishing, for a fixed π , between π ‐free sequences and the sequences which differ from any π ‐free sequence in more than ϵ n places. Our main findings are as follows: (1) For monotone patterns, that is, π  = ( k , k  − 1,…,1) and π  = (1,2,…, k ), there exists a nonadaptive one‐sided error ϵ ‐test of( ϵ − 1 log n ) O ( k 2 )query complexity. For any other π , any nonadaptive one‐sided error test requires Ω ( n ) queries. The latter lower‐bound is tight for π  = (1,3,2). For specific π ∈ S kit can be strengthened to Ω( n 1 − 2/( k  + 1) ). The general case upper‐bound is O ( ϵ −1/ k n 1 − 1/ k ). (2) For adaptive testing the situation is quite different. In particular, for any π ∈ S 3there exists an adaptive ϵ ‐tester of( ϵ − 1 log n ) O ( 1 )query complexity.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom