z-logo
Premium
Improved bounds and algorithms for graph cuts and network reliability
Author(s) -
Harris David G.,
Srinivasan Aravind
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
random structures and algorithms
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.314
H-Index - 69
eISSN - 1098-2418
pISSN - 1042-9832
DOI - 10.1002/rsa.20724
Subject(s) - graph , mathematical proof , algorithm , computer science , key (lock) , upper and lower bounds , mathematics , discrete mathematics , theoretical computer science , mathematical analysis , geometry , computer security
Karger ( SIAM Journal on Computing , 1999) developed the first fully‐polynomial approximation scheme to estimate the probability that a graph G becomes disconnected, given that its edges are removed independently with probability p . This algorithm runs inn 5 + o ( 1 )ϵ − 3time to obtain an estimate within relative error ϵ . We improve this run‐time through algorithmic and graph‐theoretic advances. First, there is a certain key sub‐problem encountered by Karger, for which a generic estimation procedure is employed; we show that this has a special structure for which a much more efficient algorithm can be used. Second, we show better bounds on the number of edge cuts which are likely to fail. Here, Karger's analysis uses a variety of bounds for various graph parameters; we show that these bounds cannot be simultaneously tight. We describe a new graph parameter, which simultaneously influences all the bounds used by Karger, and obtain much tighter estimates of the cut structure of G . These techniques allow us to improve the runtime ton 3 + o ( 1 )ϵ − 2; our results also rigorously prove certain experimental observations of Karger and Tai ( Proc. ACM‐SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms , 1997). Our rigorous proofs are motivated by certain non‐rigorous differential‐equation approximations which, however, provably track the worst‐case trajectories of the relevant parameters. A key driver of Karger's approach (and other cut‐related results) is a bound on the number of small cuts: we improve these estimates when the min‐cut size is “small” and odd, augmenting, in part, a result of Bixby ( Bulletin of the AMS , 1974).

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom