z-logo
Premium
Scaffolding and Inequitable Participation in Linguistically Diverse Book Clubs
Author(s) -
Lewis Mark A.,
Zisselsberger Margarita Gómez
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
reading research quarterly
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.162
H-Index - 90
eISSN - 1936-2722
pISSN - 0034-0553
DOI - 10.1002/rrq.234
Subject(s) - club , pedagogy , literacy , reading (process) , sociology , population , psychology , set (abstract data type) , honor , mathematics education , linguistics , medicine , philosophy , demography , computer science , anatomy , programming language , operating system
The authors illustrate ways that diverse linguistic repertoires were constrained within a set of classroom book club discussions among sixth‐grade students and their teachers in a public school setting. The study took place in a U.S. Mountain West middle school with a majority population of Latinx students, many of whom were emerging bilinguals ( EB s). In these book clubs, 21 students and two teachers read one of four mystery novels. The groups comprised both native and nonnative English‐speaking students and were grouped according to reading ability/level. Using discourse analysis strategies, the researchers analyzed the participants’ talk across the book club discussions. The authors found that although a primary purpose of a literature discussion group is to provide more equitable participatory opportunities for EB s, in this case, the linguistic and discursive practices of the teachers and the native English speakers did not fully honor EB s’ contributions. These practices led to EB s’ ultimate withdrawal from discussions. Therefore, the implications suggest a cautionary tale for educators working with EB s to critically analyze and identify ways in which generic methods for English as a second language and “good” teaching practices may position EB s as incapable. Moreover, the authors suggest that teachers should develop more critical linguistically and culturally responsive practices that acknowledge the linguistic repertoires of EB s and (re)position EB s as communicatively competent.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here