Premium
Tracking control of second‐order chained form systems by cascaded backstepping
Author(s) -
Aneke N. P. I.,
Nijmeijer H.,
de Jager A. G.
Publication year - 2003
Publication title -
international journal of robust and nonlinear control
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.361
H-Index - 106
eISSN - 1099-1239
pISSN - 1049-8923
DOI - 10.1002/rnc.709
Subject(s) - backstepping , control theory (sociology) , cascade , holonomic , integrator , controller (irrigation) , computer science , linear system , tracking (education) , exponential stability , tracking error , nonlinear system , control engineering , mathematics , control (management) , engineering , adaptive control , psychology , computer network , agronomy , mathematical analysis , pedagogy , physics , bandwidth (computing) , quantum mechanics , chemical engineering , artificial intelligence , biology
Abstract A design methodology is presented for tracking control of second‐order chained form systems. The methodology separates the tracking‐error dynamics, which are in cascade form, into two parts: a linear subsystem and a linear time‐varying subsystem. The linear time‐varying subsystem, after the first subsystem has converged, can be treated as a chain of integrators for the purposes of a backstepping controller. The two controllers are designed separately and the proof of stability is given by using a result for cascade systems. The method consists of three steps. In the first step we apply a stabilizing linear state feedback to the linear subsystem. In the second step the second subsystem is exponentially stabilized by applying a backstepping procedure. In the final step it is shown that the closed‐loop tracking dynamics of the second‐order chained form system are globally exponentially stable under a persistence of excitation condition on the reference trajectory. The control design methodology is illustrated by application to a second‐order non‐holonomic system. This planar manipulator with two translational and one rotational joint (PPR) is a special case of a second‐order non‐holonomic system. The simulation results show the effectiveness of our approach. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.