z-logo
Premium
Alternative control methods for DC–DC converters: An application to a four‐level three‐cell DC–DC converter
Author(s) -
Patino Diego,
Bâja Mihai,
Riedinger Pierre,
Cormerais Hervé,
Buisson Jean,
Iung Claude
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
international journal of robust and nonlinear control
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.361
H-Index - 106
eISSN - 1099-1239
pISSN - 1049-8923
DOI - 10.1002/rnc.1651
Subject(s) - converters , control theory (sociology) , benchmark (surveying) , waveform , model predictive control , stability (learning theory) , computer science , control (management) , engineering , voltage , geodesy , artificial intelligence , machine learning , electrical engineering , geography
This paper proposes three synthesis methods for controlling power converters. The three control strategies yield state feedback control laws that are easy to implement. The first method is a stabilization approach, based on energetic principles and the notion of Lyapunov function. The second is an optimal control approach based on the minimum principle. The third is a neural predictive approach which uses model predictive control to track a given optimal stable limit cycle. This method allows a proper control of the waveform. Except for the predictive approach, system stability for the methods is guaranteed by construction. The four‐level three‐cell DC–DC converter is used as a benchmark to test these strategies. Simulation and experimental results show that the methods have a good performance even with load perturbations. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom