z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Equivalent clinical outcome after vitrified‐thawed blastocyst transfer using semi‐automated embryo vitrification system compared with manual vitrification method
Author(s) -
Miwa Atsuko,
Noguchi Yukiko,
Hosoya Kayo,
Mori Yuusuke,
Sato Takuma,
Kasahara Yuta,
Hidaka Miwa,
Hayashi Hiroshi
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
reproductive medicine and biology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.005
H-Index - 22
eISSN - 1447-0578
pISSN - 1445-5781
DOI - 10.1002/rmb2.12320
Subject(s) - vitrification , miscarriage , blastocyst transfer , medicine , blastocyst , pregnancy , obstetrics , live birth , gynecology , embryo transfer , cryopreservation , andrology , embryo , biology , embryogenesis , genetics , microbiology and biotechnology
Purpose This study compared Gavi ® , an automated system for the equilibration and dehydration steps of vitrification, and a manual vitrification procedure in terms of effects on clinical outcomes. Methods The authors retrospectively compared survival rate, and clinical and perinatal outcomes after vitrified‐thawed single blastocyst transfer between Gavi ® (G method) in 398 cases and Cryotop ® (C method) in 208 cases. Results With C and G methods, survival rates were 98.6% (208/211) and 99.3% (398/401), total pregnancy rates were 34.3% (72/208) and 33.4% (133/398), and total miscarriage rates were 22.2% (16/72) and 24.8% (33/133), respectively. Among women <35 years old, pregnancy rates were 41.1% (30/73) and 40.5% (62/153) and miscarriage rates were 13.3% (4/30) and 16.1% (10/62) with C and G methods, respectively. Among women ≥35 years old, pregnancy rates were 31.1% (42/135) and 29.0% (71/245) and miscarriage rates were 28.6% (12/42) and 32.4% (23/71) with C and G methods, respectively. C and G methods showed no significant differences in any trials, including gestational age, cesarean section rate, or birthweight ( P  > .05 each). Conclusions Gavi ® showed comparable clinical outcomes to the manual vitrification method and can be considered an alternative vitrification procedure in assisted reproductive technology.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here