Open AccessPhase III trial comparing the efficacy and safety of recombinant‐ or urine‐derived human chorionic gonadotropin for ovulation triggering in Japanese women diagnosed with anovulation or oligo‐ovulation and undergoing ovulation induction with follitropin‐alfa
Author(s) -
Ikenaga Hideyuki,
Tanaka Yudai,
Shiotani Masahide,
Rogoff Daniela,
Shimizu Shin,
Ishihara Osamu
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
reproductive medicine and biology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.005
H-Index - 22
eISSN - 1447-0578
pISSN - 1445-5781
DOI - 10.1002/rmb2.12008
Subject(s) - ovulation induction , ovulation , human chorionic gonadotropin , anovulation , medicine , polycystic ovary , ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome , follicular phase , gonadotropin , endocrinology , andrology , gynecology , pregnancy , hormone , biology , in vitro fertilisation , insulin resistance , insulin , genetics
Aim Outside of Japan, recombinant‐human chorionic gonadotropin (r‐ hCG ) is widely used for the induction of final follicular maturation and early luteinization in women undergoing ovulation induction; whereas in Japan, urine‐derived hCG (u‐ hCG ) is predominantly used. The primary objective of this study was to demonstrate the non‐inferiority of r‐ hCG to u‐ hCG for ovulation induction, as assessed by the ovulation rate. Methods This was an open‐label, parallel‐group, randomized, multicenter, phase III trial in Japanese women with anovulation or oligo‐ovulation secondary to hypothalamic–pituitary dysfunction or polycystic ovary syndrome, undergoing ovulation induction with recombinant‐human follicle‐stimulating hormone. The women were randomized (2:1) to receive either a single 250 μg s.c. dose of r‐ hCG or a single 5000 IU i.m. dose of u‐ hCG for ovulation triggering. Results Eighty‐one women were randomized to either r‐ hCG (n=54) or u‐ hCG (n=27). Ovulation occurred in 100% of the participants and treatment with r‐ hCG was observed to be non‐inferior to u‐ hCG for ovulation induction. Overall, the type and severity of adverse events were as expected for women receiving fertility treatment. Conclusion This study demonstrated that r‐ hCG was non‐inferior to u‐ hCG for inducing ovulation. Furthermore, r‐ hCG demonstrated an expected safety profile, with no new safety concerns identified.