z-logo
Premium
Protecting environmental audits and reports: Balancing self‐examination and self‐protection
Author(s) -
Erickson Randall L.
Publication year - 1995
Publication title -
remediation journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.762
H-Index - 27
eISSN - 1520-6831
pISSN - 1051-5658
DOI - 10.1002/rem.3440050205
Subject(s) - audit , business , strengths and weaknesses , environmental audit , public relations , accounting , political science , psychology , social psychology
Recently, some companies have begun making environmental reports and internal audits public. Other companies have chosen not to do so. The desire to engage in a critical and thorough self‐examination is often thwarted by the fear that audits and other reports may be used against a company in later litigation or administrative proceedings. However, there are some legal, regulatory, and procedural safeguards that can protect a company that chooses to make reports and audits public. This article examines these safeguards, their strengths and weaknesses, and their role in balancing self‐examination and self‐protection.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here