Premium
Laboratory and initial field testing of the Min‐Trap™ for tracking reactive iron sulfide mineral formation during in situ remediation
Author(s) -
Ulrich Shan,
Martin Tilton Jennifer,
JusticiaLeon Shandra,
Liles David,
Prigge Robert,
Carter Erika,
Divine Craig,
Taggart Dora,
Clark Katherine
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
remediation journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.762
H-Index - 27
eISSN - 1520-6831
pISSN - 1051-5658
DOI - 10.1002/rem.21681
Subject(s) - mackinawite , ferrous , sulfide minerals , chemistry , sulfate , sulfide , mineralogy , mineral , sulfur , environmental chemistry , ferric , pyrite , inorganic chemistry , organic chemistry
The Mineral Trap, or Min‐Trap™, is a monitoring well‐based sampler designed to collect direct physical evidence of reactive mineral formation in situ without collecting soil or rock core samples. The Min‐Trap consists of a nonreactive granular medium (e.g., silica sand) within water‐permeable mesh pillows that are supported inside a slotted polyvinyl chloride housing that is incubated within a conventional monitoring well. The primary objective of the Min‐Trap in this application is to collect reactive minerals that are forming in the aquifer in a retrievable format that can be submitted for laboratory analysis. To evaluate the capability of Min‐Traps to capture reactive iron minerals, both a laboratory tank test and a field test were conducted. Both tests confirmed that iron sulfide minerals form in the Min‐Trap under sulfate reducing conditions within several weeks. Analysis of the precipitated minerals via the AMIBA analysis suite showed that they almost entirely consisted of weak acid soluble (biogenic, microcrystalline) ferrous iron‐based minerals, and at least two thirds of the sulfur‐containing minerals were monosulfides (i.e., mackinawite) at the end of each test. Scanning electron microscopy confirmed the colocation of iron and sulfur in the mineral masses. The dominance of the ferrous iron and reduced sulfur verifies that little to no oxidation of the captured minerals occurred between sample collection and analysis. A subsurface soil core was collected during the field test next to the Min‐Trap‐containing well. AMIBA results were consistent between the native soil and the Min‐Trap except for much higher strong acid soluble (crystalline) ferric iron in the native soil when compared to the silica sand of the Min‐Trap, as expected. This work shows that Min‐Traps are useful for documenting the formation of reactive iron sulfides (FeS x ) that can form during in situ anaerobic biostimulation and can drive complementary abiotic treatment of chlorinated volatile organic compounds. Mineralogical data obtained from Min‐Traps can be applied to assess remedial objectives at several stages of the remedial program, including initial characterization, alternatives evaluation, feasibility testing, remedy optimization, and transition from active treatment to passive remedial methods.