Premium
Matrix Diffusion Modeling Applied to Long‐Term Pump‐and‐Treat Data: 1. Method Development
Author(s) -
McDade James M.,
Kulkarni Poonam R.,
Seyedabbasi M. Ahmad,
Newell Charles J.,
Gandhi Deepa,
Gallinatti John D.,
Cocianni Virgilio,
Ferguson Du'Bois J.
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
remediation journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.762
H-Index - 27
eISSN - 1520-6831
pISSN - 1051-5658
DOI - 10.1002/rem.21349
Subject(s) - plume , groundwater , aquifer , permeability (electromagnetism) , diffusion , soil science , matrix (chemical analysis) , vadose zone , environmental science , water well , hydrology (agriculture) , geology , geotechnical engineering , chemistry , meteorology , thermodynamics , chromatography , geography , biochemistry , physics , membrane
Despite the installation in the 1980s and 1990s of hydraulic containment systems around known source zones (four slurry walls and ten pump‐and‐treat systems), trichloroethene (TCE) plumes persist in the three uppermost groundwater‐bearing units at the Middlefield‐Ellis‐Whisman (MEW) Superfund Study Area in Mountain View, California. In analyzing TCE data from 15 recovery wells, the observed TCE mass discharge decreased less than an order of magnitude over a 10‐year period despite the removal of an average of 11 pore volumes of affected groundwater. Two groundwater models were applied to long‐term groundwater pump‐and‐treat data from 15 recovery wells to determine if matrix diffusion could explain the long‐term persistence of a TCE plume. The first model assumed that TCE concentrations in the plume are controlled only by advection, dispersion, and retardation (ADR model). The second model used a one‐dimensional diffusion equation in contact with two low‐permeability zones (i.e., upper and lower aquitard) to estimate the potential effects of matrix diffusion of TCE into and out of low‐permeability media in the plume. In all 15 wells, the matrix diffusion model fit the data much better than the ADR model (normalized root mean square error of 0.17 vs. 0.29; r 2 of 0.99 vs. 0.19), indicating that matrix diffusion is a likely contributing factor to the persistence of the TCE plume in the non‐source‐capture zones of the MEW Study Area's groundwater‐extraction wells. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.