Premium
Designing funnel‐and‐gate groundwater remediation systems near property corners
Author(s) -
Hudak Paul F.
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
remediation journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.762
H-Index - 27
eISSN - 1520-6831
pISSN - 1051-5658
DOI - 10.1002/rem.20303
Subject(s) - funnel , hydraulic conductivity , aquifer , plume , groundwater , groundwater flow , geotechnical engineering , geology , soil science , engineering , mechanical engineering , physics , soil water , thermodynamics
Numerical models were used to simulate alternative funnel‐and‐gate groundwater remediation structures near property corners in hypothetical homogeneous and heterogeneous unconfined aquifers. Each structure comprised a highly permeable central gate (hydraulic conductivity = 25 m/d) and soil‐bentonite slurry walls (hydraulic conductivity = 0.00009 m/d). Gates were perpendicular to regional groundwater flow and approximately 5 m from a contaminant plume's leading tip. Funnel segments collinear to the central gate reached property boundaries; additional funnel segments followed property boundaries in the most hydraulically upgradient direction. Structures were 1 m thick and anchored into the base of the aquifer. Two structures were simulated for each aquifer: one with a 3.0‐m‐long central gate and funnels on either side; and a second with a 1.5‐m‐long central gate, funnels on either side, and 0.75‐m‐long end gates. Funnels were lengthened in successive simulations, until a structure contained a contaminant plume. Results suggest that, for the same total gate length, one‐gate structures may facilitate more rapid remediation, up to 44 percent less time in trials conducted in this study, than multiple‐gate structures constructed near property corners. However, in order to effectively contain a plume, one‐gate structures were up to 46 percent larger than multiple‐gate structures. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.