Premium
Image‐guided navigation: the surgeon's perspective on performance consequences and human factors issues
Author(s) -
Manzey Dietrich,
Röttger Stefan,
BahnerHeyne J. Elin,
SchulzeKissing Dirk,
Dietz Andreas,
Meixensberger Jürgen,
Strauss Gero
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
the international journal of medical robotics and computer assisted surgery
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.556
H-Index - 53
eISSN - 1478-596X
pISSN - 1478-5951
DOI - 10.1002/rcs.261
Subject(s) - workload , perspective (graphical) , usability , situation awareness , patient safety , medicine , computer science , health care , human–computer interaction , artificial intelligence , economic growth , engineering , economics , aerospace engineering , operating system
Background Image‐guided navigation (IGN) represents a first step in the automation of surgical functions. The use of IGN can involve several human factors issues that must be taken into account when evaluating their impact on surgical performance and patient safety. Methods A nationwide survey was conducted among 213 surgeons from 112 German hospitals in order to assess the perceived performance consequences and human factors issues of IGN, including changes of situation awareness, performance and workload, as well as issues of overreliance, skill degradation and usability. Results Generally, surgeons report improved performance and patient safety related to the use of IGN. However, issues of increased time pressure and mental demands were reported by inexperienced users. Furthermore, overreliance on IGN represents a risk, albeit only in a minority of respondents. Conclusions IGN is evaluated as a helpful tool for surgeons. However, special care should be taken to provide surgeons with sufficient time and training during familiarization with an IGN system. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.