Premium
Comparison of pathological outcomes between robotic rectal cancer surgery and laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: A meta‐analysis based on seven randomized controlled trials
Author(s) -
Liao Guixiang,
Zhao Zhihong,
Deng Haijun,
Li Xianming
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
the international journal of medical robotics and computer assisted surgery
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.556
H-Index - 53
eISSN - 1478-596X
pISSN - 1478-5951
DOI - 10.1002/rcs.2027
Subject(s) - medicine , colorectal cancer , randomized controlled trial , total mesorectal excision , confidence interval , resection margin , meta analysis , surgery , margin (machine learning) , laparoscopic surgery , cancer , laparoscopy , resection , machine learning , computer science
Abstract Objective To compare the pathologic outcomes between robotic‐assisted rectal cancer surgery (RRCS) and laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery (LRCS) based on randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Methods Electronic databases were searched from their inception to 7 October 2018, for RCTs involving a comparison between RRCS and LRCS. Positive circumferential resection margin (CRM), distance to the distal margin, proximal margin, the rate of complete mesorectal excision, and harvested lymph nodes were interesting of outcomes. Results The positive CRM, proximal margin, and rate of complete mesorectal excision were comparable between the two techniques. RRCS resulted in better outcomes for the distance to the distal margin (mean difference: 0.83 cm, 95% confidence interval, 0.29‐1.37, P = .003). Conclusions The pathologic outcomes associated with the two approaches were comparable, with RRCS showing better outcomes for the distance to the distal margin. However, additional well‐designed studies are needed to assess whether the benefits of pathologic outcomes improve survival outcomes.