Premium
Cost‐effectiveness analysis of robot‐assisted vs. open partial nephrectomy
Author(s) -
Buse Stephan,
Hach Carolin E.,
Klumpen Phillip,
Schmitz Karoline,
Mager Rene,
Mottrie Alexandre,
Haferkamp Axel
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
the international journal of medical robotics and computer assisted surgery
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.556
H-Index - 53
eISSN - 1478-596X
pISSN - 1478-5951
DOI - 10.1002/rcs.1920
Subject(s) - nephrectomy , medicine , perioperative , surgery , cost analysis , general surgery , kidney , mathematics , operations research
Background The cost‐effectiveness of robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) vs. the open procedure is not established. Methods We estimated in‐hospital complications and the cost of RAPN vs. open partial nephrectomy (OPN) using an economic model. Costs incurred both intraoperatively and in hospital were considered. US data were extracted from existing literature. Results Mean in‐hospital costs were $14,824 (95% CI $13,368–$16,898) for RAPN and $15,094 (95% CI $13,491–$17,140) for OPN. Complications after RAPN occurred in 23.3% (95% CI 20.0–25.8%) and after OPN in 36.1% (95% CI 35.6–36.6%) of the patients. In a sensitivity analysis, limited centre experience was associated with relevant increase in RAPN cost and consequently in low cost‐effectiveness. Conclusions In this economic model based on US data, RAPN resulted in nominally lower cost but fewer perioperative complications than OPN. RAPN was not cost‐effective in less experienced centres.