Premium
A comparison of operative outcomes between standard and robotic laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
Author(s) -
Ind Thomas,
Laios Alex,
Hacking Matthew,
Nobbenhuis Marielle
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
the international journal of medical robotics and computer assisted surgery
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.556
H-Index - 53
eISSN - 1478-596X
pISSN - 1478-5951
DOI - 10.1002/rcs.1851
Subject(s) - medicine , laparotomy , meta analysis , robotic surgery , endometrial cancer , laparoscopy , medline , randomized controlled trial , blood loss , surgery , general surgery , cancer , political science , law
Background Evidence has been systematically assessed comparing robotic with standard laparoscopy for treatment of endometrial cancer. Methods A search of Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases was performed until 30th October 2016. Results Thirty‐six papers including 33 retrospective studies, two matched case–control studies and one randomized controlled study were used in a meta‐analysis. Information from a further seven registry/database studies were assessed descriptively. There were no differences in the duration of surgery but days stay in hospital were shorter in the robotic arm (0.46 days, 95%CI 0.26 to 0.66). A robotic approach had less blood loss (57.74 mL, 95%CI 38.29 to 77.20), less conversions to laparotomy (RR = 0.41, 95%CI 0.29 to 0.59), and less overall complications (RR = 0.82, 95%CI 0.72 to 0.93). A robotic approach had higher costs ($1746.20, 95%CI $63.37 to $3429.03). Conclusion A robotic approach has favourable clinical outcomes but is more expensive.