Premium
Single‐site robotic cholecystectomy: efficiency and cost analysis
Author(s) -
Buzad Francis A.,
Corne Louis M.,
Brown Thomas C.,
Fagin Randy S.,
Hebert April E.,
Kaczmarek Charles A.,
Pack Angie N.,
Payne Thomas N.
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
the international journal of medical robotics and computer assisted surgery
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.556
H-Index - 53
eISSN - 1478-596X
pISSN - 1478-5951
DOI - 10.1002/rcs.1507
Subject(s) - perioperative , cholecystectomy , laparoscopic cholecystectomy , blood loss , medicine , surgery , robotic surgery , general surgery
Background Single‐incision surgery has gained in popularity, and the recent development of specialized robotic and laparoscopic instruments may remove some of the ergonomic and technical difficulties associated with this approach. However, questions of cost and efficiency remain. Methods We prospectively collected perioperative outcome and efficiency (operative time, case volume) data for our single‐site robotic cholecystectomy cases and retrospectively reviewed data for our single‐incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy cases. Results There were no differences in patient characteristics or perioperative outcomes between the robotic ( n = 20) and laparoscopic ( n = 10) groups; operative times were equivalent (84.6 vs 85.5 min; p = 0.8737) and blood loss and complications were minimal. There was a higher robotic case volume, with an average of two robotic cases (range 1–4)/day vs one/day for laparoscopic cases (range 1–1; p = 0.0306). Streamlined instrument costs were essentially equivalent. Conclusions Robotic single‐site cholecystectomy is a safe, cost‐effective alternative to single‐incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a robot‐existing model. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.