z-logo
Premium
Sample acidification has a predictable effect on isotopic ratios of particulate organic matter along the Chilean coast
Author(s) -
BarriosGuzmán Carmen,
Sepúlveda Maritza,
Docmac Felipe,
Zarate Patricia,
Reyes Hernán,
Harrod Chris
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
rapid communications in mass spectrometry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.528
H-Index - 136
eISSN - 1097-0231
pISSN - 0951-4198
DOI - 10.1002/rcm.8511
Subject(s) - chemistry , particulates , stable isotope ratio , δ13c , environmental chemistry , salinity , organic matter , δ15n , total organic carbon , isotopes of carbon , trophic level , ecology , oceanography , geology , biology , physics , organic chemistry , quantum mechanics
Rationale Stable isotopes of carbon and nitrogen have proved to be valuable tools for researchers working across the different subfields of ecology. However, the chemical pretreatment of samples prior to analytical determination of stable isotope ratios can influence the results, and therefore conclusions regarding the ecology of the taxon or system under study. Here, we determined the effect of vapor acidification with concentrated HCl on the δ 13 C and δ 15 N values of particulate organic matter (POM), which are commonly used as baselines for studies of trophic ecology, or to understand oceanographic patterns. Methods Samples of marine POM were obtained along a large‐scale latitudinal gradient ( ca 3000 km) along the Chilean coast, along with a range of oceanographic variables thought to potentially influence inorganic carbon at each sampling location. A random subset of 50 samples was divided into two parts: one acidified by HCl fumigation treatment, and the other acting as a control. We compared paired differences in δ 13 C and δ 15 N values measured by continuous flow isotope ratio mass spectrometry and used a model selection approach to examine which oceanographic factor best explained shifts in values following acid treatment. Results Acidification resulted in statistically significant reductions in both δ 13 C and δ 15 N values, but the effect was relatively small. The model that best explained the differences between acidified and non‐acidified δ 13 C values included depth, salinity and sea‐surface temperature at the sampling point. A regression of acidified on non‐acidified δ 13 C values shows that the treatment effect was strongest on samples more depleted in 13 C. Conclusions The differences between δ 13 C and δ 15 N values in acidified and non‐acidified samples are linear and predictable. This implies that the nature of the POM and its possible alteration during the acid treatment are important factors that support the reliable determination of the values of δ 13 C and δ 15 N of POM.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here