Premium
Improvement of the 15 N gas flux method for in situ measurement of soil denitrification and its product stoichiometry
Author(s) -
Well Reinhard,
Burkart Stefan,
Giesemann Anette,
Grosz Balázs,
Köster Jan Reent,
LewickaSzczebak Dominika
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
rapid communications in mass spectrometry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.528
H-Index - 136
eISSN - 1097-0231
pISSN - 0951-4198
DOI - 10.1002/rcm.8363
Subject(s) - chemistry , flux (metallurgy) , denitrification , analytical chemistry (journal) , detection limit , mass spectrometry , nitrogen , sensitivity (control systems) , trace gas , stoichiometry , isotope , atmosphere (unit) , soil water , in situ , environmental chemistry , soil science , chromatography , environmental science , meteorology , physics , organic chemistry , quantum mechanics , electronic engineering , engineering
Rationale Field measurement of denitrification in agricultural ecosystems using the 15 N gas flux method has been limited by poor sensitivity because current isotope ratio mass spectrometry is not precise enough to detect low 15 N 2 fluxes in the presence of a high atmospheric N 2 background. For laboratory studies, detection limits are improved by incubating soils in closed systems and under N 2 ‐depleted atmospheres. Methods We developed a new procedure to conduct the 15 N gas flux method suitable for field application using an artificially N 2 ‐depleted atmosphere to improve the detection limit at the given precision of mass spectrometry. Laboratory experiments with and without 15 N‐labelling and using different flushing strategies were conducted to develop a suitable field method. Subsequently, this method was tested in the field and results were compared with those obtained from the conventional 15 N gas flux method. Results Results of the two methods were in close agreement showing that the denitrification rates determined were not biased by the flushing procedure. Best sensitivity for N 2 + N 2 O fluxes was 10 ppb, which was 80‐fold better than that of the reference method. Further improvement can be achieved by lowering the N 2 background concentration below the values established in the present study. Conclusions In view of this progress in sensitivity, the new method will be suitable to measure denitrification dynamics in the field beyond peak events.