Premium
Ion mobility mass spectrometry of saponin ions
Author(s) -
Decroo Corentin,
Colson Emmanuel,
Lemaur Vincent,
Caulier Guillaume,
De Winter Julien,
CabreraBarjas Gustavo,
Cornil Jérôme,
Flammang Patrick,
Gerbaux Pascal
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
rapid communications in mass spectrometry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.528
H-Index - 136
eISSN - 1097-0231
pISSN - 0951-4198
DOI - 10.1002/rcm.8193
Subject(s) - chemistry , ion , mass spectrometry , ion mobility spectrometry , saponin , characterization (materials science) , molecule , tandem mass spectrometry , fragmentation (computing) , collision induced dissociation , molecular dynamics , chemical physics , analytical chemistry (journal) , computational chemistry , chromatography , nanotechnology , organic chemistry , materials science , medicine , alternative medicine , pathology , computer science , operating system
Rationale Saponins are natural compounds presenting a high structural diversity whose structural characterization remains extremely challenging. Ideally, saponin structures are best established using nuclear magnetic resonance experiments conducted on isolated molecules. However, saponins are also increasingly characterized using tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) coupled with liquid chromatography, even if collision‐induced dissociation (CID) experiments are often quite limited in accurately determining the saponin structure. Methods We consider here ion mobility mass spectrometry (IMMS) as an orthogonal tool for the structural characterization of saponin isomers by comparing the experimental collisional cross sections (CCSs) of saponin ions with theoretical CCSs for candidate ion structures. Indeed, state‐of‐the‐art theoretical calculations perfectly complement the experimental results, allowing the ion structures to be deciphered at the molecular level. Results We demonstrate that ion mobility can contribute to the structural characterization of saponins because different saponin ions present significantly distinct CCSs. Depending on the nature of the cation (in the positive ion mode), the differences in CCSs can also be exacerbated, optimizing the gas‐phase separation. When associated with molecular dynamics simulations, the CCS data can be used to describe the interactions between the cations, i.e. H + , Na + and K + , and the saponin molecules at a molecular level. Conclusions Our work contributes to resolve the relationship between the primary and secondary structures of saponin ions. However, it is obvious that the structural diversity and complexity of the saponins cannot be definitively unraveled by measuring a single numerical value, here the CCS. Consequently, the structural characterization of unknown saponins will be difficult to achieve based on IMMS alone. Nevertheless, we demonstrated that monodesmosidic and bidesmosidic saponins can be distinguished via IMMS.