Premium
A simple and reliable method reducing sulfate to sulfide for multiple sulfur isotope analysis
Author(s) -
Geng Lei,
Savarino Joel,
Savarino Clara A.,
Caillon Nicolas,
Cartigny Pierre,
Hattori Shohei,
Ishino Sakiko,
Yoshida Naohiro
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
rapid communications in mass spectrometry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.528
H-Index - 136
eISSN - 1097-0231
pISSN - 0951-4198
DOI - 10.1002/rcm.8048
Subject(s) - chemistry , sulfur , sulfide , sulfate , volume (thermodynamics) , hydrogen sulfide , analytical chemistry (journal) , isotope , chromatography , organic chemistry , physics , quantum mechanics
Rationale Precise analysis of four sulfur isotopes of sulfate in geological and environmental samples provides the means to extract unique information in wide geological contexts. Reduction of sulfate to sulfide is the first step to access such information. The conventional reduction method suffers from a cumbersome distillation system, long reaction time and large volume of the reducing solution. We present a new and simple method enabling the process of multiple samples at one time with a much reduced volume of reducing solution. Methods One mL of reducing solution made of HI and NaH 2 PO 2 was added to a septum glass tube with dry sulfate. The tube was heated at 124°C and the produced H 2 S was purged with inert gas (He or N 2 ) through gas‐washing tubes and then collected by NaOH solution. The collected H 2 S was converted into Ag 2 S by adding AgNO 3 solution and the co‐precipitated Ag 2 O was removed by adding a few drops of concentrated HNO 3 . Results Within 2–3 h, a 100% yield was observed for samples with 0.2–2.5 μmol Na 2 SO 4 . The reduction rate was much slower for BaSO 4 and a complete reduction was not observed. International sulfur reference materials, NBS‐127, SO‐5 and SO‐6, were processed with this method, and the measured against accepted δ 34 S values yielded a linear regression line which had a slope of 0.99 ± 0.01 and a R 2 value of 0.998. Conclusions The new methodology is easy to handle and allows us to process multiple samples at a time. It has also demonstrated good reproducibility in terms of H 2 S yield and for further isotope analysis. It is thus a good alternative to the conventional manual method, especially when processing samples with limited amount of sulfate available.