z-logo
Premium
Immunosuppressive drugs in whole blood: validation of a commercially available liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry kit and comparison with immunochemical assays
Author(s) -
Polledri Elisa,
Mercadante Rosa,
Ferraris Fusarini Chiara,
Maiavacca Rita,
Fustii Silvia
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
rapid communications in mass spectrometry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.528
H-Index - 136
eISSN - 1097-0231
pISSN - 0951-4198
DOI - 10.1002/rcm.7887
Subject(s) - chemistry , chromatography , liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry , tandem mass spectrometry , mass spectrometry , immunoassay , whole blood , therapeutic drug monitoring , pharmacology , drug , antibody , medicine , immunology
Rationale In the determination of immunosuppressive drugs cyclosporine A (CSA), tacrolimus (TARO), sirolimus (SIRO), and everolimus (EVE) in whole blood there is an open debate about which is the best assay between immunochemistry and liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS). This work is aimed to explore this topic, focusing on the use of updated assays and the analysis of a large number of samples. Methods A certified in vitro diagnostic kit coupled with a medical device LC/MS/MS was validated and applied to the analysis of 1192 blood samples of patients treated with immunosuppressive drugs. The results were compared with those obtained by immunoassays. Results The LC/MS/MS approach was found to provide linear, stable, precise, and accurate results, with lower limits of quantification of 12.5, 1.1, 1.2, and 1.2 μg/L for CSA, TACRO, SIRO, and EVE, respectively. With this method 80 samples were analysed and reported within a single work shift. A correlation was observed between the LC/MS/MS and immunoassay data, with Spearman correlation coefficients of 0.980 ( n  = 260) for CSA, 0.836 for TACRO ( n  = 562), 0.898 for SIRO ( n  = 113), and 0.904 for EVE ( n  = 257). Passing‐Bablock regression showed the presence of constant and proportional biases for most of the drugs. A Blond‐Altman graph showed differences between the assays, with immunoassays generally overestimating the drugs. Conclusions The LC/MS/MS certified kit was validated for the detection of immunosuppressant drugs in whole blood and it provided a high‐throughput method that is consistent with the requirements of clinical laboratories. The comparison of patient data between LC/MS/MS and up‐dated immunoassays shows that a significant discrepancy still exists, especially for CSA and SIRO, confirming the greater specificity associated with use of the LC/MS/MS assay Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom