z-logo
Premium
N 2 O source partitioning in soils using 15 N site preference values corrected for the N 2 O reduction effect
Author(s) -
Wu Di,
Köster Jan Reent,
Cárdenas Laura M.,
Brüggemann Nicolas,
LewickaSzczebak Dominika,
Bol Roland
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
rapid communications in mass spectrometry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.528
H-Index - 136
eISSN - 1097-0231
pISSN - 0951-4198
DOI - 10.1002/rcm.7493
Subject(s) - chemistry , denitrification , soil water , fractionation , isotope , stable isotope ratio , nitrous oxide , nitrification , atmosphere (unit) , analytical chemistry (journal) , nitrogen , environmental chemistry , soil science , chromatography , thermodynamics , environmental science , physics , organic chemistry , quantum mechanics
Rationale The aim of this study was to determine the impact of isotope fractionation associated with N 2 O reduction during soil denitrification on N 2 O site preference (SP) values and hence quantify the potential bias on SP‐based N 2 O source partitioning. Methods The N 2 O SP values ( n  = 431) were derived from six soil incubation studies in N 2 ‐free atmosphere, and determined by isotope ratio mass spectrometry (IRMS). The N 2 and N 2 O concentrations were measured directly by gas chromatography. Net isotope effects (NIE) during N 2 O reduction to N 2 were compensated for using three different approaches: a closed‐system model, an open‐system model and a dynamic apparent NIE function. The resulting SP values were used for N 2 O source partitioning based on a two end‐member isotopic mass balance. Results The average SP 0 value, i.e. the average SP values of N 2 O prior to N 2 O reduction, was recalculated with the closed‐system model, resulting in −2.6 ‰ (±9.5), while the open‐system model and the dynamic apparent NIE model gave average SP 0 values of 2.9 ‰ (±6.3) and 1.7 ‰ (±6.3), respectively. The average source contribution of N 2 O from nitrification/fungal denitrification was 18.7% (±21.0) according to the closed‐system model, while the open‐system model and the dynamic apparent NIE function resulted in values of 31.0% (±14.0) and 28.3% (±14.0), respectively. Conclusions Using a closed‐system model with a fixed SP isotope effect may significantly overestimate the N 2 O reduction effect on SP values, especially when N 2 O reduction rates are high. This is probably due to soil inhomogeneity and can be compensated for by the application of a dynamic apparent NIE function, which takes the variable reduction rates in soil micropores into account. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom