Premium
Analysis of nitrogen‐based explosives with desorption atmospheric pressure photoionization mass spectrometry
Author(s) -
Kauppila T. J.,
Flink A.,
Pukkila J.,
Ketola R. A.
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
rapid communications in mass spectrometry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.528
H-Index - 136
eISSN - 1097-0231
pISSN - 0951-4198
DOI - 10.1002/rcm.7469
Subject(s) - chemistry , picric acid , pentaerythritol tetranitrate , desorption electrospray ionization , trinitrotoluene , mass spectrometry , nitric acid , desorption , static secondary ion mass spectrometry , dart ion source , chemical ionization , analytical chemistry (journal) , inorganic chemistry , explosive material , organic chemistry , ionization , ion , chromatography , secondary ion mass spectrometry , adsorption , electron ionization
Rationale Fast methods that allow the in situ analysis of explosives from a variety of surfaces are needed in crime scene investigations and home‐land security. Here, the feasibility of the ambient mass spectrometry technique desorption atmospheric pressure photoionization (DAPPI) in the analysis of the most common nitrogen‐based explosives is studied. Methods DAPPI and desorption electrospray ionization (DESI) were compared in the direct analysis of trinitrotoluene (TNT), trinitrophenol (picric acid), octogen (HMX), cyclonite (RDX), pentaerythritol tetranitrate (PETN), and nitroglycerin (NG). The effect of different additives in DAPPI dopant and in DESI spray solvent on the ionization efficiency was tested, as well as the suitability of DAPPI to detect explosives from a variety of surfaces. Results The analytes showed ions only in negative ion mode. With negative DAPPI, TNT and picric acid formed deprotonated molecules with all dopant systems, while RDX, HMX, PETN and NG were ionized by adduct formation. The formation of adducts was enhanced by addition of chloroform, formic acid, acetic acid or nitric acid to the DAPPI dopant. DAPPI was more sensitive than DESI for TNT, while DESI was more sensitive for HMX and picric acid. Conclusions DAPPI could become an important method for the direct analysis of nitroaromatics from a variety of surfaces. For compounds that are thermally labile, or that have very low vapor pressure, however, DESI is better suited. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.