Premium
Quantification of the PR‐39 cathelicidin compound in porcine blood by matrix‐assisted laser desorption/ionization time‐of‐flight mass spectrometry
Author(s) -
Smolira Anna,
Hałas Stanisław,
WesselySzponder Joanna
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
rapid communications in mass spectrometry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.528
H-Index - 136
eISSN - 1097-0231
pISSN - 0951-4198
DOI - 10.1002/rcm.7284
Subject(s) - chemistry , chromatography , cathelicidin , mass spectrometry , matrix assisted laser desorption/ionization , sample preparation , time of flight mass spectrometry , matrix (chemical analysis) , analytical chemistry (journal) , standard curve , whole blood , calibration curve , detection limit , ionization , desorption , peptide , ion , antimicrobial peptides , surgery , biochemistry , medicine , organic chemistry , adsorption
Rationale The PR‐39 porcine cathelicidin occurs naturally in animal neutrophils. Its main function is antimicrobial activity, which potentially can be used in antibiotic treatments in veterinary medicine. Investigations concerning such a use require the detection and quantification of PR‐39 in a given sample. The aim of this work is to determine the concentration of PR‐39 contained in porcine blood. Methods Prior to matrix‐assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI) analysis, the porcine blood sample was subjected to crude extraction in order to release the active form of PR‐39 from the neutrophil granules. Next, gel filtration chromatography was performed to separate PR‐39 from other cathelicidins present in porcine blood. Positive ion MALDI time‐of‐flight (TOF) mass spectra of the resulting portion of lyophilisate with unknown PR‐39 content were acquired in linear mode. To quantify PR‐39 in the lyophilisate sample, the standard addition method was applied. The PR‐39 concentration obtained in the lyophilisate sample was then converted into the peptide concentration in porcine blood. Results The linear fit function of the constructed calibration curve indicates an excellent correlation between the PR‐39 peak intensity and the added quantity of synthetic PR‐39 ( R 2 = 0.994) and a low relative standard deviation of the slope = 1.98%. From the x ‐intercept of the straight line, we estimated the PR‐39 concentration in porcine blood to be 20.5 ± 4.6 ng/mL. Conclusions The MALDI method was successfully applied for the quantitative analysis of PR‐39 found in porcine blood. Compared with other available methods, it is relatively easy, inexpensive and not time‐consuming. Despite the method having lower accuracy than the enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), the results obtained here, by a much simpler method, are in good agreement with the literature data. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.