z-logo
Premium
Evaluation of low‐pressure gas chromatography linked to ion‐trap tandem mass spectrometry for the fast trace analysis of multiclass pesticide residues
Author(s) -
GonzálezRodríguez M. J.,
GarridoFrenich A.,
Arrebola F. J.,
MartínezVidal J. L.
Publication year - 2002
Publication title -
rapid communications in mass spectrometry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.528
H-Index - 136
eISSN - 1097-0231
pISSN - 0951-4198
DOI - 10.1002/rcm.707
Subject(s) - chemistry , chromatography , analytical chemistry (journal) , mass spectrometry , tandem mass spectrometry , detection limit , gas chromatography , gas chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry , capillary action , ion trap , gas chromatography–mass spectrometry , materials science , composite material
A rapid multiresidue method for the analysis of 72 pesticides has been developed using a single injection with low‐pressure gas chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (LP‐GC/MS/MS). The LP‐GC/MS/MS method used a short capillary column of 10 m × 0.53 mm i.d. × 0.25 µm film thickness coupled with a 0.6 m × 0.10 mm i.d. restriction at the inlet end. Optimal LP‐GC conditions were determined which achieved the fastest separation in MS/MS detection mode. Also MS/MS conditions were optimized in order to increase sensitivity and selectivity. The analytical parameters of the LP‐GC/MS/MS method were compared with those obtained by GC/MS/MS using a conventional capillary column (30 m × 0.25 mm i.d. × 0.25 µm film thickness). Better precision and sensitivity values were obtained with the LP‐GC/MS/MS approach. The limits of detection (LOD) of the compounds ranged from 0.1 to 14.1 µg L −1 for LP‐GC/MS/MS, lower than those obtained for conventional GC/MS/MS that ranged from 0.1 to 17.5 µg L −1 . The peak widths obtained with the short column in LP‐GC are similar to those obtained using conventional capillary GC columns, and the peaks can be successfully identified by MS/MS detection with the conventional scan speed of ion‐trap instruments. In addition, the analysis time was significantly reduced with LP‐GC/MS/MS (32 min) versus GC/MS/MS (72 min), allowing the number of samples analyzed per day in a routine laboratory to be doubled. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom