z-logo
Premium
Molecular dynamic‐secondary ion mass spectrometry (D‐SIMS) ionized by co‐sputtering with C 60 + and Ar +
Author(s) -
You YunWen,
Chang HsunYun,
Lin WeiChun,
Kuo CheHung,
Lee SzuHsian,
Kao WeiLun,
Yen GuoJi,
Chang ChiJen,
Liu ChiPing,
Huang ChihChieh,
Liao HuaYang,
Shyue JingJong
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
rapid communications in mass spectrometry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.528
H-Index - 136
eISSN - 1097-0231
pISSN - 0951-4198
DOI - 10.1002/rcm.5181
Subject(s) - sputtering , chemistry , analytical chemistry (journal) , ion beam , static secondary ion mass spectrometry , mass spectrometry , fluence , secondary ion mass spectrometry , ion , ionization , polyatomic ion , ion source , materials science , thin film , chromatography , nanotechnology , organic chemistry
Dynamic secondary ion mass spectrometry (D‐SIMS) analysis of poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) and poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) was conducted using a quadrupole mass analyzer with various combinations of continuous C 60 + and Ar + ion sputtering. Individually, the Ar + beam failed to generate fragments above m / z 200, and the C 60 + beam generated molecular fragments of m / z ~1000. By combining the two beams, the auxiliary Ar + beam, which is proposed to suppress carbon deposition due to C 60 + bombardment and/or remove graphitized polymer, the sputtering range of the C 60 + beam is extended. Another advantage of this technique is that the high sputtering rate and associated high molecular ion intensity of the C 60 + beam generate adequate high‐mass fragments that mask the damage from the Ar + beam. As a result, fragments at m / z ~900 can be clearly observed. As a depth‐profiling tool, the single C 60 + beam cannot reach a steady state for either PET or PMMA at high ion fluence, and the intensity of the molecular fragments produced by the beam decreases with increasing C 60 + fluence. As a result, the single C 60 + beam is suitable for profiling surface layers with limited thickness. With C 60 + ‐Ar + co‐sputtering, although the initial drop in intensity is more significant than with single C 60 + ionization because of the damage introduced by the auxiliary Ar + , the intensity levels indicate that a more steady‐state process can be achieved. In addition, the secondary ion intensity at high fluence is higher with co‐sputtering. As a result, the sputtered depth is enhanced with co‐sputtering and the technique is suitable for profiling thick layers. Furthermore, co‐sputtering yields a smoother surface than single C 60 + sputtering. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom