Premium
Systematic comparison of δ 13 C measurements of testosterone and derivative steroids in a freeze‐dried urine candidate reference material for sports drug testing by gas chromatography/combustion/isotope ratio mass spectrometry and uncertainty evaluation using four different metrological approaches
Author(s) -
Munton Ellaine,
Murby John,
Hibbert D. Brynn,
SantamariaFernandez Rebeca
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
rapid communications in mass spectrometry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.528
H-Index - 136
eISSN - 1097-0231
pISSN - 0951-4198
DOI - 10.1002/rcm.4983
Subject(s) - chemistry , isotope ratio mass spectrometry , calibration , certified reference materials , etiocholanolone , analyte , chromatography , isotope , analytical chemistry (journal) , isotope dilution , gas chromatography , androsterone , mass spectrometry , detection limit , statistics , mathematics , hormone , steroid , biochemistry , physics , quantum mechanics
An alternative calibration procedure for use when performing carbon isotope ratio measurements by gas chromatography/combustion/isotope ratio mass spectrometry (GC/C/IRMS) has been developed. This calibration procedure does not rely on the corrections in‐built in the instrument software, as the carbon isotope ratios of a sample are calculated from the measured raw peak areas. The method was developed for the certification of a urine reference material for sports drug testing, as the estimation of measurement uncertainty is greatly simplified. To ensure that the method is free from bias arising from the choice of calibration material and instrument, the carbon isotope ratios of steroids in urine extracts were measured using two different instruments in different laboratories, and three different reference materials (CU/USADA steroid standards from Brenna Laboratory, Cornell University; NIST RM8539 mineral oil; methane calibrated against NIST RM8560 natural gas). The measurements were performed at LGC and the Australian National Measurement Institute (NMI). It was found that there was no significant difference in measurement results when different instruments and reference materials were used to measure the carbon isotope ratio of the major testosterone metabolites androsterone and etiocholanolone, or the endogenous reference compounds pregnanediol, 11‐ ketoetiocholanolone and 11β‐hydroxyandrosterone. Expanded measurement uncertainties at the 95% coverage probability ranged from 0.21‰ to 1.4‰, depending on analyte, instrument and reference material. The measurement results of this comparison were used to estimate a measurement uncertainty of δ 13 C for the certification of the urine reference material being performed on a single instrument using a single reference material at NMI. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.