Premium
Reconstructing bulk isotope ratios from compound‐specific isotope ratios
Author(s) -
Morrison Douglas J.,
Cooper Karen,
Preston Tom
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
rapid communications in mass spectrometry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.528
H-Index - 136
eISSN - 1097-0231
pISSN - 0951-4198
DOI - 10.1002/rcm.4577
Subject(s) - chemistry , isotope , radiochemistry , nuclear physics , physics
Carbon isotope analysis by bulk elemental analysis coupled with isotope ratio mass spectrometry has been the mainstay of δ 13 C analyses both at natural abundance and in tracer studies. More recently, compound‐specific isotope analysis (CSIA) has become established, whereby organic constituents are separated online by gas or liquid chromatography before oxidation and analysis of CO 2 for constituent δ 13 C. Theoretically, there should be concordance between bulk δ 13 C measurements and carbon‐weighted δ 13 C measurements of carbon‐containing constituents. To test the concordance between the bulk and CSIA, fish oil was chosen because the majority of carbon in fish oil is in the triacylglycerol form and ∼95% of this carbon is amenable to CSIA in the form of fatty acids. Bulk isotope analysis was carried out on aliquots of oil extracted from 55 fish samples and δ 13 C values were obtained. Free fatty acids (FFAs) were produced from the oil samples by saponification and derivatised to fatty acid methyl esters (FAMEs) for CSIA by gas chromatography/combustion/isotope ratio mass spectrometry. A known amount of an internal standard (C15:0 FAME) was added to allow analyte quantitation. This internal standard was also isotopically calibrated in both its FFA ( δ 13 C = −34.30‰) and FAME ( δ 13 C = −34.94‰) form. This allowed reporting of FFA δ 13 C from measured FAME δ 13 C values. The bulk δ 13 C was reconstructed from CSIA data based on each FFA δ 13 C and the relative amount of CO 2 produced by each analyte. The measured bulk mean δ 13 C (SD) was −23.75‰ (1.57‰) compared with the reconstructed bulk mean δ 13 C of −23.76 (1.44‰) from CSIA and was not significantly different. Further analysis of the data by the Bland‐Altman method did not show particular bias in the data relative to the magnitude of the measurement. Good agreement between the methods was observed with the mean difference between methods (range) of 0.01‰ (−1.50 to 1.30). Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.