z-logo
Premium
Simultaneous determination of parabens, triclosan and triclocarban in water by liquid chromatography/electrospray ionisation tandem mass spectrometry
Author(s) -
GonzálezMariño Iria,
Quintana José Benito,
Rodríguez Isaac,
Cela Rafael
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
rapid communications in mass spectrometry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.528
H-Index - 136
eISSN - 1097-0231
pISSN - 0951-4198
DOI - 10.1002/rcm.4069
Subject(s) - chemistry , triclocarban , chromatography , triclosan , mass spectrometry , liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry , electrospray ionization , tandem mass spectrometry , triple quadrupole mass spectrometer , electrospray , paraben , extraction (chemistry) , solid phase extraction , elution , detection limit , matrix (chemical analysis) , selected reaction monitoring , preservative , medicine , food science , pathology
A method for the determination of several household biocides in water by liquid chromatography/electrospray ionisation tandem mass spectrometry (LC/ESI‐MS/MS) is presented. It permits the simultaneous determination of triclosan (TCS), triclocarban (TCC) and seven parabens, including the distinction between branched and linear isomers of propyl ( i ‐PrP and n ‐PrP) and butyl parabens ( i ‐BuP and n ‐BuP). Prior to LC/MS/MS, analytes are preconcentrated by solid‐phase extraction (SPE) on Oasis HLB (60 mg) cartridges at natural sample pH and subsequently eluted with 4 mL of methanol. This simple SPE procedure provides extraction recoveries above 85% except for raw wastewater, where it falls to 65% for TCC. The performance of the method was tested with two triple‐quadrupole LC/MS instruments from a low/mid and mid/high market range: a Varian 1200L and an API‐4000. The latter system provided between 3 and 80 times lower limits of quantification (LOQs) than the first one, in the 0.08–0.44 ng/L range for surface water. Moreover, a comparison of matrix effects on both instruments showed a very different behaviour, particularly in the case of parabens. For these compounds signal suppression was observed in the 1200L instrument and signal enhancement with the 4000 instrument. As a result, different calibration approaches were chosen for them and this pointed to the need of matrix effect re‐evaluation in method transfer between different LC/MS systems. The application of the method to real samples showed the ubiquity of methyl paraben (MeP) and n ‐PrP (at the 1–6 µg/L in raw wastewater) and the coexistence of i ‐BuP and n ‐BuP at similar levels (ca. 100–200 ng/L in raw wastewater). Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom