z-logo
Premium
Unusual observations during steroid analysis
Author(s) -
Kwok Wai Him,
Leung David K. K.,
Leung Gary N. W.,
Tang Francis P. W.,
Wan Terence S. M.,
Wong Colton H. F.,
Wong Jenny K. Y.
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
rapid communications in mass spectrometry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.528
H-Index - 136
eISSN - 1097-0231
pISSN - 0951-4198
DOI - 10.1002/rcm.3420
Subject(s) - androsterone , chemistry , urine sample , chromatography , steroid , urine , gas chromatography–mass spectrometry , hydrogen–deuterium exchange , deuterium , testosterone (patch) , sample (material) , mass spectrometry , medicine , biochemistry , hormone , physics , quantum mechanics
In September 2005, our laboratory detected the presence of 4‐androstene‐3,17‐dione and androsterone in a standard steroid screen of a post‐race gelding urine sample received from an overseas authority. All other urine samples from the same batch tested negative. Subsequent gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) confirmatory analyses, however, repeatedly failed to detect any amount of 4‐androstene‐3,17‐dione and androsterone in the suspicious sample. On the other hand, identical results were obtained when the initial GC/MS screening method was repeated on the suspicious sample as well as on the other samples of the same batch, showing the presence of 4‐androstene‐3,17‐dione and androsterone only in the suspicious sample. These unusual and contradictory findings between the screening and confirmatory procedures were investigated, leading to the unequivocal conclusion that the 4‐androstene‐3,17‐dione and androsterone observed during screening were artefacts from the internal standards, [16,16,17‐ d 3 ]‐testosterone and [16,16,17‐ d 3 ]‐5 α ‐androstane‐3 α ,17 β ‐diol. The two deuterated internal standards were thought to have undergone first an enzymatic oxidation of the 17 β ‐hydroxyl group to a 17‐keto function by the enzyme 17 β ‐hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase; complete deuterium‐hydrogen exchange at C16 during the methanolysis deconjugation step would then produce the two artefacts. The findings from this study highlight the potential problem of using internal standards in qualitative confirmatory analyses, which may lead to undesirable false positive results. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here