z-logo
Premium
On the N 2 O correction used for mass spectrometric analysis of atmospheric CO 2
Author(s) -
Assonov S. S.,
Brenninkmeijer C. A. M.
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
rapid communications in mass spectrometry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.528
H-Index - 136
eISSN - 1097-0231
pISSN - 0951-4198
DOI - 10.1002/rcm.2516
Subject(s) - chemistry , analytical chemistry (journal) , limiting , isobaric process , isotope , mass spectrometry , physics , thermodynamics , nuclear physics , chromatography , mechanical engineering , engineering
To obtain accurate values of δ 13 C(CO 2 ) and δ 18 O(CO 2 ) on environmental CO 2 by mass spectrometry, the raw isotope data must be corrected for the isobaric N 2 O contribution. This is one of the analytical problems limiting inter‐laboratory δ 13 C(CO 2 ) data consistency. The key parameter, the N 2 O relative ionisation efficiency ( ${\rm E}_{{\rm N}_2 {\rm O}}$ ), cannot be determined with sufficient accuracy by direct measurements of pure N 2 O. The determination of ${\rm E}_{{\rm N}_2 {\rm O}}$ by analyses on N 2 OCO 2 mixtures of known isotope composition and mixing proportions has been recently suggested. In this work we propose a new method of N 2 O correction which uses the m/z 30 signal as a measure of the N 2 O/CO 2 ratio, so that determinations of ${\rm E}_{{\rm N}_2 {\rm O}}$ and N 2 O content are not required. The method uses the fact that fragment‐ion spectra of N 2 O and CO 2 are very specific. The formalism of the correction is considered. Various tests demonstrate that the new method is robust, stable and easy to implement in practice. The effective value $^{30} {\rm R}_{{\rm N}_2 {\rm O}}$ (the key parameter for the new correction) has to be calibrated on known N 2 OCO 2 mixtures by measuring 30 R signals only. The method accuracy we presently achieved is around 2.5% and any error which appears to come mostly from our N 2 OCO 2 mixture preparation. Based on our tests and error considerations, the error of the proposed method that may be achieved is as low as ±1.5% (relative to the correction magnitude). For tropospheric CO 2 this means ±0.003‰ and ±0.005‰ for δ 13 C(CO 2 ) and δ 18 O(CO 2 ), respectively. The proposed method may be valuable for small samples where no separate N 2 O determinations are available (e.g. ice core samples and CF‐IRMS measurements) as well as for determination of ${\rm E}_{{\rm N}_2 {\rm O}}$ and testing the ‘traditional’ N 2 O correction based on mass balance calculations. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom