Premium
Stable isotope analysis of safety matches using isotope ratio mass spectrometry–a forensic case study
Author(s) -
Farmer N. L.,
MeierAugenstein W.,
Kalin R. M.
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
rapid communications in mass spectrometry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.528
H-Index - 136
eISSN - 1097-0231
pISSN - 0951-4198
DOI - 10.1002/rcm.2088
Subject(s) - isotope ratio mass spectrometry , chemistry , isotope analysis , isotope , forensic science , natural abundance , stable isotope ratio , mass spectrometry , crime scene , yield (engineering) , statistics , analytical chemistry (journal) , sample (material) , chromatography , archaeology , psychology , mathematics , criminology , geology , oceanography , physics , materials science , quantum mechanics , metallurgy , history
Isotope ratio mass spectrometry (IRMS) was used to assess what contribution the technique could make towards the comparative analysis of matchstick samples within the ‘normal’ framework of a forensic investigation. A method was developed to allow the comparison of samples submitted as a result of an investigation, with the added advantage of rapid sample turn‐around expected within this field. To the best of our knowledge this is the first time that wooden safety matches have been analysed using IRMS. In this particular case, bulk stable isotope analysis carrried out on a ‘like‐for‐like’ basis could demonstrate conclusively that matches seized from a suspect were different from those collected at the scene of crime. The maximum δ 13 C variability observed within one box was 2.5‰, which, in conjunction with the error of measurement, was regarded to yield too wide an error margin as to permit differentiation of matchsticks based on 13 C isotopic composition alone given that the ‘natural’ 13 C abundance in wood ranges from −20 to −30‰. However, from the δ 2 H values obtained for crime scene matches and seized matches of −114.5‰ and −65‰, respectively, it was concluded that the matches seized were distinctly different from those collected at the crime scene. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.