z-logo
Premium
Proton affinities of molecules containing nitrogen and oxygen: comparing ab initio and semiempirical results to experiments
Author(s) -
Ozment Judy L.,
Schmiedekamp Ann M.
Publication year - 1992
Publication title -
international journal of quantum chemistry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.484
H-Index - 105
eISSN - 1097-461X
pISSN - 0020-7608
DOI - 10.1002/qua.560430606
Subject(s) - affinities , chemistry , mndo , proton affinity , ab initio , computational chemistry , proton , ab initio quantum chemistry methods , molecule , basis set , gaussian orbital , density functional theory , stereochemistry , protonation , organic chemistry , physics , ion , quantum mechanics
We report a comparison of theoretical and experimental proton affinities at nitrogen and oxygen sites within a series of small molecules. The calculated proton affinities are determined using the semiempirical methods AM 1, MNDO , and PM 3; the ab initio Hartree–Fock method at the following basis levels: 3‐21 G //3‐21 G , 3‐21+ G //3‐21 G , 6‐31 G *//6‐31 G *, and 6‐31+ G ( d , p )//6‐31 G *; and Møller–Plesset perturbation calculations: MP 2/6‐31 G *//6‐31 G *, MP 3/6‐31 G *//6‐31 G *, MP 2/6‐31 G +( d , p )//6‐31 G *, MP 3/6‐31 G +( d , p )//6‐31 G *, and MP 4( SDTQ )/6‐31 G + G ( d , p )//6‐31 G *. The semiempirical methods have more nonsystematic scatter from the experimental values, compared to even the minimal 3‐21 G level ab initio calculations. The thermodynamically corrected 6‐31 G *//6‐31 G * proton affinities provide acceptable results compared to experiment, and we see no significant improvement over 6‐31 G *//6‐31 G * in the proton affinities with any of the higher‐level calculations. © 1992 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom