Premium
Basis set and correlation effects on computed negative ion hydrogen bond energies of the complexes AH n · AH n−1 −1 : AH n NH 3 , OH 2 , and FH
Author(s) -
Del Bene Janet E.
Publication year - 1987
Publication title -
international journal of quantum chemistry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.484
H-Index - 105
eISSN - 1097-461X
pISSN - 0020-7608
DOI - 10.1002/qua.560320807
Subject(s) - basis set , chemistry , electronic correlation , binding energy , solvation , atomic physics , enthalpy , hydrogen bond , ion , valence (chemistry) , hydrogen atom , atom (system on chip) , computational chemistry , crystallography , molecule , density functional theory , physics , thermodynamics , group (periodic table) , organic chemistry , computer science , embedded system
Basis set and correlation effects on computed hydrogen bond energies of the negative ion complexes AH n · AH n−1 −1 , for AH n NH 3 , OH 2 , and FH, have been evaluated. The addition of diffuse functions on nonhydrogen atoms to valence double‐ and triple‐split plus polarization basis sets [6‐31G(d, p) and 6‐311G(d, p)] significantly decreases binding energies by 9–19 kcal/mol, depending on the particular complex and the level of theory. Adding diffuse functions to hydrogens has a negligible effect, while replacing the single set of polarization functions on each atom by two sets alters energies by 1 kcal/mol or less. Electron correlation increases the hydrogen bond energies of these complexes and has a greater effect for basis sets without diffuse functions. Since the Hartee‐Fock energies computed with these basis sets are already too large, correlation energy calculations should not be performed in these cases. For basis sets including diffuse functions, the correlation energy contribution to the binding energies of these complexes is significant, with the Møller‐Plesset second‐order term being the largest term and having a stabilizing effect of from 3–6 kcal/mol. The third and fourth order terms are smaller, and may be of opposite sign. As a result, the MP2 and MP4 energies differ by no more than 1 kcal/mol, with the MP2 stabilization energy being greater except for N 2 H 5 −1 . The computed standard solvation enthalpy of OH −1 by H 2 O based on either MP4/6–311 + G (2 d , 2 p ) or MP2/6–31 + G ( d , p ) electronic energies is –26.8 kcal/mol, in excellent agreement with a recent gas‐phase experimental measurement.