z-logo
Premium
Comparison of triel bonds with different chalcogen electron donors: Its dependence on triel donor and methyl substitution
Author(s) -
Chi Zongqing,
Li Qingzhong,
Li HaiBei
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
international journal of quantum chemistry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.484
H-Index - 105
eISSN - 1097-461X
pISSN - 0020-7608
DOI - 10.1002/qua.26046
Subject(s) - electronegativity , chemistry , chalcogen , atom (system on chip) , crystallography , halogen , halogen bond , bond energy , molecule , organic chemistry , alkyl , computer science , embedded system
The complexes between R 3 Tr (Tr = B, Al, and Ga; R = H, F, Cl, and Br) and H 2 X (X = O, S, and Se) were theoretically studied. The interaction energies of R 3 Al⋯H 2 X and R 3 Ga⋯H 2 X are consistent with the electronegativity of the halogen atom R (R ≠ H), but an opposite dependence is found for R 3 B⋯H 2 X. The triel bond of R 3 Tr⋯H 2 X is weaker for the heavier chalcogen donor. The dependence of triel bonding strength on the triel atom is complicated, depending on the nature of R and X. The methyl substitution of H 2 X causes a substantial increase in the interaction energy from −5.74 kcal/mol to −22.88 kcal/mol, and its effect is relevant to the nature of Tr, X, and R groups. For the S and Se donors, the increased percentage of interaction energy is almost the same due to the methyl substitution, which is larger than that of the O analogue. In most triel‐bonded complexes, electrostatic dominates and polarization has comparable contribution. However, polarization plays a dominant role in R 3 B⋯ R 2 ′ S and R 3 B⋯ R 2 ′ Se (R = Cl and Br; R′ = H and Me).

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom