z-logo
Premium
Theoretical study of cooperative effects in the homo‐ and heteromeric hydrogen bond chains (HCN) n HF with n = 1, 2, and 3
Author(s) -
Araújo Regiane C. M. U.,
Soares Verneck M.,
Oliveira Boaz G.,
Lopes Kelson C.,
Ventura Elizete,
Do Monte Silmar A.,
Santana Otávio L.,
Carvalho Antônio B.,
Ramos Mozart N.
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
international journal of quantum chemistry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.484
H-Index - 105
eISSN - 1097-461X
pISSN - 0020-7608
DOI - 10.1002/qua.21132
Subject(s) - chemistry , basis set , intermolecular force , proton , density functional theory , hydrogen bond , ab initio , computational chemistry , dipole , acceptor , crystallography , molecule , physics , organic chemistry , quantum mechanics , condensed matter physics
Theoretical investigations concerning the formation of hydrogen bonds in both homomeric, (HCN) n , and heteromeric clusters of the type (HCN) n HF ( n = 1, 2, and 3) have been performed through ab initio molecular orbital calculations at the second‐order Møller–Plesset (MP2) and density functional theory (DFT)/B3LYP levels, with the 6‐311++G( d,p ) basis set. The formation of hydrogen bonds is investigated in terms of changes in structural, electronic, and vibrational parameters of the free species. Important parameters include the increment in the distance of the HF proton donor species, the increment in the HC distance of HCN moiety, and the amount of intermolecular charge transfer between the HCN species in the (HCN) n group. It is interesting to point out the different behavior in the HC distance as HCN acts simultaneously as a proton acceptor, proton donor, and a proton donor and acceptor. Other important results concern the cooperative effect (CE) in terms of the stabilization energy and dipole moment. Both CEs increase with cluster size and are more pronounced for the heteroclusters. The HF stretching frequency is red‐shifted on going in the direction (HCN)HF → (HCN) 2 HF → (HCN) 3 HF. This trend is in agreement with the following order of stabilization energies: Δ E HCN…HF < Δ E   (HCN)   2 …HF< Δ E   (HCN)   3 …HF . © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Int J Quantum Chem, 2006

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here