Premium
An investigation on the reaction mechanism of the F 2 +Cl 2 →2ClF using the B3LYP method
Author(s) -
Wang Zun Yao,
Gong Xue Dong,
Li Jin Shan,
Xiao He Ming
Publication year - 2002
Publication title -
international journal of quantum chemistry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.484
H-Index - 105
eISSN - 1097-461X
pISSN - 0020-7608
DOI - 10.1002/qua.10011
Subject(s) - chemistry , transition state , dissociation (chemistry) , molecule , ab initio , bond dissociation energy , reaction mechanism , density functional theory , bond length , atom (system on chip) , molecular geometry , crystallography , computational chemistry , atomic physics , physics , catalysis , biochemistry , organic chemistry , computer science , embedded system
The reaction mechanism of F 2 +Cl 2 →2ClF has been investigated with the density functional theory at the B3LYP/6‐311G* level. Six transition states have been found for the three possible reaction paths and verified by the normal mode vibrational and IRC analyses. Ab initio MP2/6‐311G* geometry optimizations and CCSD(T)/6‐311G(2df)//MP2/6‐311G* single‐point energy calculations have been performed for comparison. It is found that when the F 2 (or Cl 2 ) molecule decomposes into atoms first and then the F (or Cl) atom reacts with the molecule Cl 2 (or F 2 ) nearly along the molecular axis, the energy barrier is very low. The calculated energy barrier of F attacking Cl 2 is zero and that of Cl attacking F 2 is only 15.57 kJ⋅mol −1 at the B3LYP level. However, the calculated dissociation energies of F 2 and Cl 2 are as high as 145.40 and 192.48 kJ⋅mol −1 , respectively. When the reaction proceeds through a bimolecular reaction mechanism, two four‐center transition states are obtained and the lower energy barrier is 218.69 kJ⋅mol −1 . Therefore, the title reaction F 2 +Cl 2 →2ClF is most probably initiated from the atomization of the F 2 molecule and terminated by the reaction of F attacking Cl 2 nearly along the ClCl bond. MP2 calculations lead to the same conclusion, but the geometry of TS and the energy barrier are somewhat different. © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Int J Quantum Chem, 2002