z-logo
Premium
An investigation on the reaction mechanism of the F 2 +Cl 2 →2ClF using the B3LYP method
Author(s) -
Wang Zun Yao,
Gong Xue Dong,
Li Jin Shan,
Xiao He Ming
Publication year - 2002
Publication title -
international journal of quantum chemistry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.484
H-Index - 105
eISSN - 1097-461X
pISSN - 0020-7608
DOI - 10.1002/qua.10011
Subject(s) - chemistry , transition state , dissociation (chemistry) , molecule , ab initio , bond dissociation energy , reaction mechanism , density functional theory , bond length , atom (system on chip) , molecular geometry , crystallography , computational chemistry , atomic physics , physics , catalysis , biochemistry , organic chemistry , computer science , embedded system
The reaction mechanism of F 2 +Cl 2 →2ClF has been investigated with the density functional theory at the B3LYP/6‐311G* level. Six transition states have been found for the three possible reaction paths and verified by the normal mode vibrational and IRC analyses. Ab initio MP2/6‐311G* geometry optimizations and CCSD(T)/6‐311G(2df)//MP2/6‐311G* single‐point energy calculations have been performed for comparison. It is found that when the F 2 (or Cl 2 ) molecule decomposes into atoms first and then the F (or Cl) atom reacts with the molecule Cl 2 (or F 2 ) nearly along the molecular axis, the energy barrier is very low. The calculated energy barrier of F attacking Cl 2 is zero and that of Cl attacking F 2 is only 15.57 kJ⋅mol −1 at the B3LYP level. However, the calculated dissociation energies of F 2 and Cl 2 are as high as 145.40 and 192.48 kJ⋅mol −1 , respectively. When the reaction proceeds through a bimolecular reaction mechanism, two four‐center transition states are obtained and the lower energy barrier is 218.69 kJ⋅mol −1 . Therefore, the title reaction F 2 +Cl 2 →2ClF is most probably initiated from the atomization of the F 2 molecule and terminated by the reaction of F attacking Cl 2 nearly along the ClCl bond. MP2 calculations lead to the same conclusion, but the geometry of TS and the energy barrier are somewhat different. © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Int J Quantum Chem, 2002

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom