Premium
An improving approach for failure mode and effect analysis under uncertainty environment: A case study of critical function component
Author(s) -
Huang Guangquan,
Xiao Liming,
Zhang Wei,
Li Jian,
Zhang Genbao,
Ran Yan
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
quality and reliability engineering international
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.913
H-Index - 62
eISSN - 1099-1638
pISSN - 0748-8017
DOI - 10.1002/qre.2686
Subject(s) - randomness , failure mode and effects analysis , vagueness , weighting , computer science , component (thermodynamics) , reliability engineering , risk analysis (engineering) , fuzzy logic , data mining , mode (computer interface) , operations research , engineering , artificial intelligence , mathematics , medicine , statistics , physics , radiology , operating system , thermodynamics
Failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) is a powerful risk discerning technique for identifying, evaluating, and reducing possible failures of products or processes. However, the classical FMEA has been criticized for inherent limitations, such as equal weights of risk elements and lack of capability in handling inaccurate information. Although fuzzy‐based modified FMEA methods are frequently utilized to handle vagueness of experts' judgments, they still have some drawbacks, for example, requiring extra assumptions, neglecting experts' bounded rationality and psychological effects, lacking consideration of randomness, and only considering three classical risk elements among most of them. Therefore, this study develops an extended risk assessment method to enhance the performance of FMEA, which integrates the superiority of rough number theory in handling subjective and inaccurate information and the advantage of cloud model theory in reflecting the randomness of qualitative evaluations. Moreover, two synthetic weighting methods are developed to determine the weights of risk elements and handle the experts' individual effects, respectively, which consider both subjective and objective aspects. In addition, maintenance is added into the classical risk elements, and then a hierarchical structure containing four risk dimensions is built to evaluate failures' risk levels comprehensively. Finally, an application case to demonstrate the effectiveness of the developed FMEA model is presented.