Premium
Reduced‐bias Moment Approximations in Original Units When Using Multivariate Box–Cox Transformations
Author(s) -
Perry Marcus B.
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
quality and reliability engineering international
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.913
H-Index - 62
eISSN - 1099-1638
pISSN - 0748-8017
DOI - 10.1002/qre.2004
Subject(s) - ellipsoid , multivariate statistics , mathematics , covariance matrix , covariance , transformation (genetics) , nonlinear system , statistics , physics , biochemistry , chemistry , quantum mechanics , astronomy , gene
Motivated by A‐10 single engine aircraft climb experiments, we demonstrate use of the multivariate Box–Cox power transformations in fitting normal‐theory linear models to a q ‐variate response vector Y . As predictions in the original units of the response are often desired, a retransformation of the fitted model back to the original units can be performed. Unfortunately, Jensen's inequality suggests that for a nonlinear transformation, such an approach can induce significant bias into the retransformed values. Further, although the retransformation offers a direct estimate of E ( Y ), it offers no direct estimates for the variances and covariances of Y . An estimate for the variance–covariance matrix can be useful when constructing approximate joint prediction regions on Y . To address these concerns, we consider the class of multivariate Box–Cox transformations and derive a closed‐form approximation to EY ik iY jk j( k i , k j ∈[0,1,...]; i , j = 1,…, q ), which can then be used to provide reduced‐bias estimates of elements of the mean vector and covariance matrix of the original response Y , given parameter estimates obtained from fitting the model in the transformed domain. Using our approximation, we then construct an approximate 100(1 − α )% joint prediction ellipsoid on Y . Unlike the prediction ellipsoid offered by ordinary least squares analysis, the proposed prediction ellipsoid can change in both size and orientation, depending on the levels of the experimental factors. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.