z-logo
Premium
Classical design structure of orthogonal designs with six to eight factors and sixteen runs
Author(s) -
Johnson Mark E.,
Jones Bradley
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
quality and reliability engineering international
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.913
H-Index - 62
eISSN - 1099-1638
pISSN - 0748-8017
DOI - 10.1002/qre.1170
Subject(s) - fractional factorial design , plackett–burman design , mathematics , status quo , point (geometry) , column (typography) , arithmetic , factorial experiment , combinatorics , statistics , geometry , response surface methodology , connection (principal bundle) , economics , market economy
Most two‐level fractional factorial designs used in practice involve independent or fully confounded effects (so‐called regular designs). For example, for 16 runs and 6 factors, the classical resolution IV design with defining relation I = ABCE = BCDF = ADEF has become the de facto gold standard. Recent work has indicated that non‐regular orthogonal designs could be preferable in some circumstances. Inhibiting a wider usage of these non‐regular designs seems to be a combination of inertia/status quo and perhaps the general resistance and suspicion to designs that are computer generated to achieve ‘ X – Y – Z ’ optimality. In this paper each of the orthogonal non‐isomorphic two‐level, 16 run designs with 6, 7, or 8 factors (both regular and non‐regular) are shown to have a classical‐type construction with a 2 4 or a replicated 2 3 starting point. Additional factor columns are defined either using the familiar one‐term column generators or generators using weighted sums of effects. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom