Premium
The marine atmospheric boundary layer during semaphore. II: Turbulence profiles in the mixed layer
Author(s) -
Lambert D.,
Durand P.,
Thoumieux F.,
Bénech B.,
Druilhet A.
Publication year - 1999
Publication title -
quarterly journal of the royal meteorological society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.744
H-Index - 143
eISSN - 1477-870X
pISSN - 0035-9009
DOI - 10.1002/qj.49712555408
Subject(s) - semaphore , boundary layer , planetary boundary layer , layer (electronics) , turbulence , environmental science , mixed layer , atmospheric sciences , meteorology , geology , mechanics , physics , materials science , computer science , operating system , composite material
The marine atmospheric boundary layer (MABL) analysed over the midlatitude ocean during SEMAPHORE (Structure des Echanges Mer‐Atmosphère, Propriétés des Hétérogénéités Océaniques: Recherche Expérimentale) was topped by a broken stratocumulus layer. Around midday, this layer was decoupled from the surface. the mixed layer which develops under the influence of surface buoyancy flux therefore stays well below the cloud layer. In this paper, we present a parametrization of turbulence moments and spectral characteristics in this mixed layer. the data were gathered in autumn 1993 by two instrumented aircraft in the Azores region. We began by analysing a large number of runs, each over 100 km in length, in order to determine what scales must be taken into account for estimating turbulence moments. the turbulence characteristics were thus calculated on 241 straight and level runs performed at various altitudes in the mixed layer during 17 flights over a period of 10 days, with various winds and surface fluxes. the turbulence profiles were normalized using the convective‐scales, computed from the mixed‐layer thickness (not the whole MABL thickness), and the surface fluxes. the contribution to buoyancy of temperature and moisture fluctuations are of the same order of magnitude, but they are of the same sign in the lower part of the mixed layer and of the opposite sign in the upper part. the result is that buoyancy flux vanishes at the top of the mixed layer, and entrainment is weak. These features are significantly different from what is observed in continental convective boundary layers. We also examine the usefulness of skewness profiles (mainly of moisture skewness) in understanding mixed‐layer dynamics (mainly of the respective contributions of the surface and top processes).