Premium
Middle atmosphere variability in the UK Meteorological Office Unified Model
Author(s) -
Swinbank R.,
Douglas C. S.,
Lahoz W. A.,
O'neill A.,
Heaps A.
Publication year - 1998
Publication title -
quarterly journal of the royal meteorological society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.744
H-Index - 143
eISSN - 1477-870X
pISSN - 0035-9009
DOI - 10.1002/qj.49712454908
Subject(s) - stratosphere , troposphere , stratopause , climatology , polar vortex , northern hemisphere , atmospheric sciences , environmental science , potential vorticity , polar night , atmosphere (unit) , climate model , sudden stratospheric warming , quasi biennial oscillation , atmospheric circulation , anticyclone , vorticity , mesosphere , geology , vortex , climate change , meteorology , geography , oceanography
This paper describes the seasonal evolution of the stratospheric circulation simulated by a stratospheretroposphere configuration of the UK Meteorological Office (UKMO) Unified Model. Results are shown from a five‐year integration of the model. The model's simulation of the stratosphere and its seasonal evolution compares well with global analyses produced by the UKMO troposphere‐stratosphere data‐assimilation system. The contrast between the winter circulation in the two hemispheres is well simulated. The zonal‐mean winds show strong interannual variability in northern winter, while the southern hemisphere winter jet is much less variable. In northern wither the model spontaneously produces two major warmings and a number of minor warmings. In southern winter and spring the model reproduces well the break‐up of the polar vortex and elements of the flow regime that often precedes this break‐up. The model does, however, exhibit a number of shortcomings. Lack of conservation of potential vorticity prevents the model from capturing some of the ingredients of the flow regimes associated with stratospheric warmings and with the merger of anticyclones. There is a cold bias in the stratosphere throughout the year, with a maximum cold bias over the winter pole near the stratopause. This temperature bias appears to be due to a cooling bias in the long‐wave part of the radiation scheme. The model also has unrealistically strong planetary waves in the upper stratosphere, although amplitudes in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere are in good agreement with those derived from the UKMO analyses. This paper discusses possible future model improvements that should alleviate these problems.