Premium
Computation of domain‐average radiative flux profiles using Gaussian quadrature
Author(s) -
Li Jiangnan,
Barker Howard W.
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
quarterly journal of the royal meteorological society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.744
H-Index - 143
eISSN - 1477-870X
pISSN - 0035-9009
DOI - 10.1002/qj.3241
Subject(s) - radiative transfer , radiative flux , quadrature (astronomy) , physics , gaussian quadrature , gaussian , computational physics , statistical physics , algorithm , mathematics , optics , nyström method , quantum mechanics , boundary value problem
A method for calculating domain‐average radiative flux profiles, called Gaussian Quadrature Independent Column Approximation (GQ‐ICA), is introduced and assessed using cloud properties retrieved from A‐Train satellite data. This method could be suitable for use in large‐scale atmospheric models. Like the Monte Carlo ICA (McICA), GQ‐ICA uses N stochastically generated subgrid‐scale cloudy columns. The independent variable is the sorted, from smallest to largest, sequence of N sub‐column values of liquid and ice cloud water paths. The integrand is essentially the radiative transfer equation. Accurate GQ integration requires integrands to be relatively smooth functions. Unlike McICA, GQ‐ICA performs full solar and infrared spectral integrations on n G < < N sub‐columns which are identified by rules governing n G ‐node GQ. The n G flux profiles are appropriately weighted and summed to give domain averages. Several sorting procedures were considered, and all results are based on the CCCma radiation algorithm. For solar radiation, 1‐node GQ‐ICA can produce significant bias errors, but its random errors are generally less than McICA's. These biases, however, are almost eliminated by 2‐node GQ‐ICA. For GQ‐ICA to better McICA's random errors for infrared fluxes, at least the 2‐node version is needed. Ultimately, 2‐node GQ‐ICA random errors for net fluxes at surface and top‐of‐atmosphere are typically 30–50% of McICA's. This is partly because solar and infrared solvers operate on the same sub‐columns. GQ‐ICA random errors for atmospheric heating rates are comparable to McICA's even for 3‐node GQ‐ICA. Computational times required for the 2‐ and 3‐node GQ‐ICA are, respectively, ∼180 and ∼230% of McICA's.