Premium
Adaptive covariance relaxation methods for ensemble data assimilation: experiments in the real atmosphere
Author(s) -
Kotsuki Shunji,
Ota Yoichiro,
Miyoshi Takemasa
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
quarterly journal of the royal meteorological society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.744
H-Index - 143
eISSN - 1477-870X
pISSN - 0035-9009
DOI - 10.1002/qj.3060
Subject(s) - covariance , data assimilation , kalman filter , computer science , ensemble kalman filter , relaxation (psychology) , adaptive filter , control theory (sociology) , variance inflation factor , algorithm , mathematics , extended kalman filter , statistics , meteorology , artificial intelligence , linear regression , physics , machine learning , psychology , social psychology , control (management) , multicollinearity
Covariance inflation plays an important role in the ensemble Kalman filter because the ensemble‐based error variance is usually underestimated due to various factors such as the limited ensemble size and model imperfections. Manual tuning of the inflation parameters by trial and error is computationally expensive; therefore, several studies have proposed approaches to adaptive estimation of the inflation parameters. Among others, this study focuses on the covariance relaxation method which realizes spatially dependent inflation with a spatially homogeneous relaxation parameter. This study performs a series of experiments with the non‐hydrostatic icosahedral atmospheric model ( NICAM ) and the local ensemble transform Kalman filter ( LETKF ) assimilating the real‐world conventional observations and satellite radiances. Two adaptive covariance relaxation methods are implemented: relaxation to prior spread based on Ying and Zhang (adaptive‐ RTPS ), and relaxation to prior perturbation (adaptive‐ RTPP ). Both adaptive‐ RTPS and adaptive‐ RTPP generally improve the analysis compared to a baseline control experiment with an adaptive multiplicative inflation method. However, the adaptive‐ RTPS and adaptive‐ RTPP methods lead to an over‐dispersive (under‐dispersive) ensemble in the sparsely (densely) observed regions compared with the adaptive multiplicative inflation method. We find that the adaptive‐ RTPS and adaptive‐ RTPP methods are robust to a sudden change in the observing networks and observation error settings.