z-logo
Premium
Iceland's Great Frost Winter of 1917/1918 and its representation in reanalyses of the twentieth century
Author(s) -
Moore G. W. K.,
Babij M.
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
quarterly journal of the royal meteorological society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.744
H-Index - 143
eISSN - 1477-870X
pISSN - 0035-9009
DOI - 10.1002/qj.2939
Subject(s) - frost (temperature) , climatology , context (archaeology) , north atlantic oscillation , period (music) , arctic , siberian high , geography , geology , oceanography , meteorology , archaeology , physics , east asia , acoustics , china
Climate variability during the twentieth century is a subject of considerable interest as it represents a way to place the changes that we are currently experiencing into a long‐term context. The characterization of climatic extremes and their representation in models is of particular importance as these events have a significant impact on communities and ecosystems. Much of the focus on these extremes has been on events that occurred after the establishment of the upper‐air observing network in the 1950s. The recent availability of reanalyses that extend throughout the twentieth century now allow extreme events that occurred before this time to be more fully investigated. The winter of 1917/1918 is referred to as the Great Frost Winter in Iceland. It was the coldest winter in the region during the twentieth century. It was remarkable for the presence of sea ice in Reykjavik Harbour as well as for the unusually large number of polar bear sightings in northern Iceland. Here we use observations as well as two reanalyses that span the twentieth century to document this event. We show that throughout much of the region, January 1918 was the coldest winter month on record. The North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) attained one of its most negative values during January 1918 and the westward shift in its northern centre of action allowed cold Arctic and Greenlandic air to penetrate south towards Iceland. We also show that the two reanalyses diverged in their ability to represent the temperature anomalies during the event. Differences in the sea‐surface temperature (SST) and sea ice concentration fields used to force the underlying models contributed to this divergence. These results stress the important role that boundary conditions play in determining the fidelity with which reanalyses can represent extreme climate events in data‐sparse regions.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here